by Glenda Crawford

For the past three years, members of Phi Beta Kappa at Elon University have observed with deep concern the fact that national Phi Beta Kappa foreign language requirements disqualify many top students otherwise eligible for membership.  The national requirements state:

Stipulation 3: Candidates shall have demonstrated, by successful work in high school or college, or in the two together, a knowledge of a second or non-native language at least minimally appropriate for a liberal education. In no case shall this mean less than the completion of the intermediate college level in a second, or non-native, language, or its equivalent.[1]

Chart A shows that 32.6 percent of the otherwise eligible students with GPAs greater than 3.73 were disqualified last year, and 35.2 percent were disqualified this year.  The situation is becoming unfortunate. Had we explicitly followed the national requirement by requiring a second intermediate-level course (222), we would have disqualified almost half of otherwise qualified students.  Our goal as a chapter is to implement the higher national requirement in the next five years but to exclude no students because of a foreign language deficiency – an impossible goal under current conditions.

CHART A: STUDENTS OTHERWISE ELIGIBLE FOR PBK MEMBERSHIP WHO DID NOT MEET FOREIGN LANGUAGE REQUIREMENTS

2012

2013

Position of bottom student selected*

98

105

No credit for 221 or higher

32

37

%

32.6%

35.2%

No credit for 222 or higher

43

48

%

43.8%

45.7%

*All students on list met the requirement of 99 liberal arts credits.

This is not just a concern for the Phi Beta Kappa chapter.   Rather, it is a concern for all Elon students, who reasonably but mistakenly have been led to think their graduation requirements are comparable to those of other superior arts and sciences institutions across the nation.  And it is especially a problem in an institution whose mission statement affirms the goal of “preparing students to be global citizens” and whose Commitment Statement pledges us to educate “globally ready leaders.”   Chart B shows that, for the past six years, only a fourth of our graduates have left the university with a 200-level foreign language credit or higher.   This disparity between what we say and what we do is embarrassing.

CHART B: STUDENTS IN THE LAST SIX YEARS WHO GRADUATED WITH A 200-LEVEL FOREIGN LANGUAGE OR HIGHER

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

Graduates with credit for 200-level foreign language class or higher

286

264

256

246

283

   287

Total Graduates

1035

1089

1121

1118

1127

  1117

% with 200-level foreign language or higher

27.6

24.2

22.8

22.0

25.1

  25.7

A proposal for a moderate foreign language requirement is subject to the misgivings of many vested interests.  Faculty and administrators must exercise clear-sighted and decisive leadership to provide Elon students the foreign language training necessary for a meaningful global education and to bring Elon into parity with its peer schools in Phi Beta Kappa.

For these reasons, members of Eta Chapter, North Carolina, ask the faculty and administrative leadership of the university to require all Elon students to complete a foreign language course on the 221 level, or its equivalent, for graduation.

In addition, we ask faculty and administration to take the following intermediate steps while we work on the larger goal of raising the campus-wide requirement:

  • Assist the Fellows Programs, the Honors Program and the Lumen Scholars in strengthening their  foreign language requirements;
  • Add a line on check sheets and advising material, including the On Track degree audit, to inform students that PBK asks for language competency above existing requirements;
  • Integrate foreign language competency into study abroad programs;
  • Increase the visibility of foreign languages in the culture of our campus and in promotional and admissions materials;
  • Expand support for existing foreign language programs, living-learning communities, El Centro, etc.;
  • Assist the departments in Arts and Sciences (and other interested schools) in jointly adding a language requirement for their majors;
  • Work with the deans and the Student Professional Development Center to articulate how deep language instruction can be professionally beneficial.
If Elon is seriously committed to educating global citizens and globally ready leaders, all members of our community must work to deepen and strengthen our commitment to foreign languages by reconsidering both basic requirements and incentives to further study.